----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cardilini et al. (2013) Surviving in sprawling suburbs: Suburban environments represent high quality breeding habitat for a widespread shorebird. Landscape & Urban Planning 115: 72-80.
As urbanization across the United States has rapidly increased,
researchers have begun paying greater attention to urban impacts on the
environment. One such research study, carried out in 2010 on Phillip Island in
South Victoria, Australia, compared the reproductive success in suburban and
agricultural habitats of an avian species, the Lapwing, which has been proven
to be able to live in both suburban and agricultural environments. Researchers Adam P.A. Cardilini, Michael A. Westona, Dale G. Nimmoa,
Peter Dannb, and Craig D.H. Shermanc sought to investigate the correlation
between increasing urbanization and decreased biodiversity, using the Lapwing
as their species of study. In this
study, the Australian-located researchers looked at nest characteristics,
incubation and brood attendance, parental defense, and fledgling success to
assess the reproductive survival rates of Lapwings in suburban versus
agricultural habitats. Two predictions were made entering into the study.
Prediction number one stated that the quality of parental care would be higher
in an agricultural habitat than a suburban habitat. Prediction number two
stated reproductive success would be higher in agricultural habitats than in
suburban habitats.
Masked Lapwing, Vanellus miles. Photo courtesy of Wikipedia. |
The article on Lapwing survival
explains “the concept of urbanization encapsulates a broad range of land-use
changes, from the conversion of native vegetation to densely populated cities,
to the transformation of agricultural environments to low density, suburban
environments; the latter process being known as ‘urban sprawl’.” The Lapwing
study sought to understand how those changes in land use impact local native
species and their ability to successfully reproduce in the ever-increasing
urban environments compared to the decreasing abundant agricultural natural
habitats.
To measure the level of
parental care, researchers looked at incubation, brood attendance, and parental
defense measures. Incubation involves the mature Lapwings sitting on their eggs
and warming them. Brood attendance refers to care after the chicks hatch.
Parental defense measures were noted as how aggressive and attentive birds got
when their nests and chicks were approached. By close observation, researchers
determined that the number one significant indication of difference in parental
care between agricultural and suburban environments was parental defense.
Lapwings living in suburban habitats showed a higher level of aggression. Much
to the researchers surprise, Lapwings in agricultural environments did not have
a higher level of parental care. With these results, Cardilini and his team
rejected their first prediction, which states that the quality of parental care would
be higher in an agricultural habitat than a suburban habitat.
The second prediction of higher
reproductive success in agricultural habitats versus suburban habitats was
measured by monitoring hatching success of chicks from their eggs, as well as
fledgling success. Out of 105 eggs in each habitat type, 76 hatched in suburban
environments, and only 57 hatched in agricultural environments. Causes of failure
for eggs to hatch include nest abandonment, human interference, nest
depredation, crushed by stock animals, and other unknown variables. The
researchers found that although there was more human presence in suburban
habitats, more direct threats were experienced by the Lapwings in agricultural
settings, primarily that of other non-human predators and stomping from stock
animals. The difference in eggs hatched was the most significant indication
that there is disparity between suburban and agricultural habitats for
reproductive success. With these results, the second prediction, which stated
reproductive success would be higher in agricultural habitats than in suburban
habitats, like the first, was rejected.
Although there have been other
studies and statistics that have shown increased urbanization has led to
decreased biodiversity worldwide, the study on the Lapwing birds did not do
much in support of this claim. In response to their study results, the
researchers made a point that “species that benefit from urbanization are the
exception rather than the rule.” They also commented that species such as
earthworms, which Lapwings commonly eat, are an exceptional species that
thrives in urban settings. This change in food availability for the Lapwings
very well could have influenced the mature Lapwing healthy condition, which in
turn impacted the success of their hatchlings. Cardilini and team stressed, “the
predictions we made at the outset of this study require further testing on a
variety of species; their lack of application described here cannot be
generalized.” What the research team is stressing here is important for
everyone to take note of. The impact urbanization has on species biodiversity
is a real concern, altering the lived experience of plants and animals,
including humans, and should not be ignored. There will undoubtedly be further
studies on this emerging topic of concern.
No comments:
Post a Comment